ASSIGMENT THEORY CLASS WEEK #6 Essays | Online Homework Help

Welcome to week six of your nursing theory class.

We are still exploring section III which involves Conceptual Models/Grand Theories in the Integrative-Interactive Paradigm

Our text readings will include concepts from:

Chapter 12: Helen Erickson, Evelyn Tomlin, and Mary Ann Swain’s Theory or Modeling and Role Modeling

Chapter 13: Barbara Dossey’s Theory of Integral Nursing

As healthcare professionals, we need to be aware of nursing theory, as you heard it many times that it applies to our practice as nurses.

1-When you think about it?

2-how many practicing nurses are aware of the nursing theories and how they use in their careers?.

If you have a chance this week, go and ask a colleague about what they know regarding nursing theorist and who may be their favorite theorist in the profession.

You will see an overlap in the three nursing theorist listed below (Erickson, Tomlin, and Swain).

As your read and explore the following website resources, think about how their works contribute to our current practices today in nursing.

We will investigate Modeling and Role Modeling in nursing; these concepts will build upon the four metaparadigms of nursing: Person, Environment, Health, and Nursing.

When using the modeling and role-modeling theory, the nurse attempts to understand the “client’s personal model of his or her world and to appreciate its value an significance for the client from the client’s perspective.” (Masters, 2015).

Reference:

Masters, K. (2015). Nursing Theories: A Framework for Professional Practice. (2nd ed.). Burlington, Massachusetts. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Who is Helen Erickson?

Erickson’s Modeling and Role Modeling Theory

Who is Evelyn Tomlin?

http://currentnursing.com/theory/modeling_and_role-modeling_theory.html

Who is Mary Ann Swain?

https://nursology.net/nurse-theorists-and-their-work/modeling-and-role-modeling/

Video: Modeling and Role Modeling

Article: Modeling and Role Modeling

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.841.9640&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Who is Barbara Dossey? What is her Theory of Integral Nursing?

An integral process is defined as a comprehensive way to organize multiple phenomenon of human experience and reality from four perspectives:

(1) the individual interior (personal/intentional);

(2) individual exterior (physiology/behavioral);

(3) collective interior (shared/cultural); and

(4) collective exterior (systems/structures) (Dossey, n.d.).

Consciousness & Holistic nursing – Barbara Dossey part 1 out of 2

Part One

Part Two

Website: Dossey Theory of Integral Nursing

http://www.dosseydossey.com/barbara/tin.html

PowerPoint: Barbara Dossey

http://www.dosseydossey.com/barbara/pdf/Dossey_Theory_of_Integral_Nursing_powerpoint.pdf

We will have a two-part discussion question for Week Six (Worth 3 points):

How does the concept of Modeling and Role Modeling apply to the nursing care of patients? Do you see the theory of Integral Nursing being supportive or not supportive in today’s era of nursing? Explain why or why not.

Please remember the grading rubric for discussion posts.

1-Introduction and quality of discussion’s Argument
2-The objectivity of Tone, overall quality & Review of
3-Literature in APA 6th format within the past 7 years
4-Quality of Reply posts
5-Include APA references

Discussion Board Rubric

Proficient

Novice

Introduction and quality of discussion’s Argument

1.5 point

It is consistent with application in research related to its context. Clarity of ideas.

0.75 point

The topic has a partially weak association to the clarity of ideas and related topics.

The objectivity of Tone, overall quality & Review of

Literature in APA 6th format within the past 7 years

1 point

The tone is consistent, addressed professionally and objectively.

Evidence in literature supports arguments.

0.50 point

The tone is not consistently objective. Partially poor evidence in the review of the literature.

Quality of Reply posts

0.5 point

Consistent clarity and supported by research evidence.

0.25 point

Partially lack clarity or lack of support with research evidence.