counterargument to Peter Unger’s argument for skepticism Assays | Online Homework Help

Write a detailed counterargument to Peter Unger’s argument for skepticism. Does he succeed in proving that propositional knowledge is impossible? Give an analysis of his method and argument. Do all of the different steps in this argument work?
The overall project of this essay is to identify a philosophical problem, develop a thesis that responds to the problem,
and fully develop an argument supporting the thesis
Essay Content
Background You must briefly tell me about the background of the case or problem.
Argument You must develop a well thought out argument that includes responses to anticipated or
discovered objections.
NO (MERE) REPORTS You must report information that others have acquired, but you
CANNOT succeed on this essay without constructing an actual argument for an actual,
controversial thesis. No “some people say X, others say Y” nonsense, no mere reporting of
things you’ve researched. You must put all research to work in building an argument for your
thesis.
Clarification You must provide definitions of key terms, explications of major concepts, and examples
or whatever other techniques help to make your ideas clearer.
Preferred language style Simple (Easy vocabulary, simple grammar constructions)