Discussion Board Participation Rubric

Advanced Pharmacology: Discussion Board Participation Rubric
REQUIRED COURSE TEXT(S):
• Woo, T.M. & Robinson, M.V. (most current). Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Nurse Prescribers. (4th ed.). F.A. Davis: Philadelphia.
• Arcangelo, V.P. & Peterson, A.M. (most current) Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice: A Practical Approach (4thedition). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer

Discussion board participation will be assessed using the participation rubric as a guide. When appropriate make sure to use citations and references utilizing APA format. This a standardized rubric that will be utilized for all discussion board grading throughout the program.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Discussion Board Participation Rubric
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Advanced Pharmacology: Discussion Board Participation Rubric

Proficient Satisfactory Does not meet expectations No efforts
Identifies and answers questions using 2 or more evidence- based rationale on time Points:
35 (35.00%)
All of the listed considerations are clearly addressed and discussed in comprehensive detailed manner with 2 or more evidence-based rationale. Points:
30 (30.00%)
All of the listed considerations are clearly addressed and discussed in comprehensive detailed manner with 1 evidencebased rationale. Points:
25 (25.00%)
One or more of the considerations are not addressed. Some of the relevant data is missing Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not address one or more of the listed considerations or the content is not relevant
Responds to two colleagues. Include evidence- based rationale. Adds to the conversation with answers posed to colleagues Points:
25 (25.00%)
All of the listed considerations are clearly addressed and responds to 2 posts in a comprehensive detailed manner Points:
20 (20.00%)
All of the listed considerations are clearly addressed and responds to 2 posts in a comprehensive detailed manne Points:
15 (15.00%)
One or more more of the considerations are not addressed. Some of the relevant data is missing. Points:
0 (0.00%)
Did not address one or more of the listed considerations or the content is not relevant.
Evidence of Understanding Points:
20 (20.00%)
Uses resources beyond those required by the course • Knowledge gained well incorporated into responses • Consistent reflection of course content Points:
15 (15.00%)
Uses required readings & course materials • Ideas stated clearly with some connection to readings • Some reflection of content Points:
10 (10.00%)
Readings & course materials do not support opinion or discussion. • Remarks unrelated to topic Points:
0 (0.00%)
No readings course materials reflected
Depth of Commentary Points:
10 (10.00%)
Providesexamples that enhance topic understanding • Analyzes issues and implications arising from topic • Reflects insight into own learning Points:
7 (7.00%)
Restates ideas from resources that clarify topic • Identifies issues and implications arising from topic • Little insight into own learning Points:
5 (5.00%)
Commentslimited to agree and/or disagree • No issue identification • No evidence of insight into own learning Points:
0 (0.00%)
No efforts to enhance topic understanding
Grammar, Spelling, APA,Timeliness Points:
10 (10.00%)
Grammatically correct Easy to read/flow organized well • No spelling errors • APA citations/reference s utilized and are correct • Posts & Replies early Points:
8 (8.00%)
1-2 Grammar error Flow difficult to follow • 1-2 spelling errors • APA citations/referenc es not utilized and/or 1-2 errors • Posts & Replies on time Points:
5 (5.00%)
> Grammar errors • Difficult to read and/or illogical flow • >2 spelling errors • APA citations/refere nces not utilized and/or >2 errors • Posts and/or Replies late Points:
0 (0.00%)
Fails to post initial discussion; or fails to reply.
Name: Advanced Pharmacology: Discussion Board Participation Rubric

• Initial discussion post word count should be no more than 500 words; reply posts should be no more than 350 words.
• For grading criteria, see Discussion Board Participation Rubric.

• Some clarification on the Discussion Board posts:

• Individually, you are only required to answer 1 of the questions under your group for your initial post. HOWEVER, your group must address every question that is listed under your group. This means that you will need to reach out to your group members, communicate, and collaborate to ensure that your discussions are not all answering the same question. Make sure you are providing in-depth answers to the questions. Do not simply copy and paste definitions. This is not scholarly writing. Reflect on the questions, provide context in your answers – using evidence. What does the literature say about this topic? What have you encountered in practice? Use in-text citations and avoid direct quotations when possible. Remember you need to give your peers something to reflect on for response. Review the rubric before starting your post. Then review it again before posting. I find this to be helpful in ensuring you have met all the requirements of the assignment. I hope these tips help. Feel free to use to Course Q&A or email me if you need any further clarification.
PLEASE ANSWER ONLY QUESTION #1
Group 3
1. Why are beta-2 agonists not indicated for treatment of asthma in children less than 4 years of age?
2. List drugs that are indicated for the prevention of asthmatic attacks?
3. List their classification and/or their mechanism of action
4. List drugs to be avoided by asthmatic patients and state why.
5. Name drugs useful for treating seasonal rhinitis. State their classification of MOA.
6. What are the advantages and disadvantages of a nebulizer versus the MDI?For more information on Discussion Board Participation Rubric read this:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubric_(academic)

Discussion Board Participation Rubric

 

 

                                                                                                                        ACME Writers