Healthcare Paper

I. Requirement:
– 2,000 words excluding executive summary, tables, graphs, references, and appendices
– Body to include:
o 1st group assignment summary
♣ Health problem
♣ Determinants
♣ Factors contributing to the problem
♣ Target audience and their values
o 2nd group assignment summary
♣ Description of campaign
♣ Approach taken for campaign
♣ How it was implemented

o Evaluation
♣ The measures and design you used for evaluation
♣ The results
♣ Conclusions about the campaign—does this seem to be something worthwhile to implement on a larger scale? What would you do differently?
– There is a requirement to integrate at least eight published articles, books, or book chapters. These can be the same sources you had for the previous group reports and individual mini-assignments if they are appropriate.
– Discuss that participant consent for survey was embedded into the Google forms survey
II. Potential Outline for the Report
I. Executive Summary
a. Background/Goals
b. Intervention
c. Evaluation Design
d. Results
e. Conclusions
II. Health Problem
a. What need(s) were identified
b. Why this need (these needs)?
c. Describe the target audience
d. Goals of the campaign
e. Purpose of this report
III. Description of the Campaign
a. How did you develop it?
b. What did you do? (include urls, visual aids, appendices if that is helpful)
c. Why this way? (formative research)
IV. Evaluation Design
a. Identify the evaluation objectives (process and summative objectives)
b. Describe the design (pre and post-test design)
c. Who were the participants
d. Measures for the evaluation (quant and qua questions; include your complete survey questionnaires in appendices)
e. How it was implemented
f. Planned data analysis
V. Results
a. Organise around the objectives
b. Present relevant findings
i. Need to do paired sample t-test
ii. Thematic analysis
iii. Include quant and qual data as appropriate
c. Include relevant graphs, tables and quotations; present the data in an effective manner (appendices if that is helpful)
VI. Conclusion
a. Did you meet your objectives?
b. Does it seem to be something worthwhile to implement on a larger scale?
c. Reflect on areas for improvement: What would you do differently?
VII. References
VIII. Appendices
III. Group Assignment 3 Final Evaluation Report – Marking Criterion
Criterion 1: Strong research foundation for the campaign (10%). 600 words The report draws on a wide variety of research-based sources and at least eight such sources reviewed (non-research sources are welcome, too). The sources are used to develop the nature of problem, the causes of the problem, and the target audience. Sources also help to identify the theory used to by the intervention. The objectives are derived from this theory.

Criterion 2: Creation and implementation of campaign (20%). 700 words The report should adequately identify the creation of the campaign and research (formative and library) used to support it. There should be details about where and when the campaign was done and the implementation was effective given constraints of time and budget. The campaign itself is creative and relevant to the health problem and follows a clear theoretical framework.

Criterion 3: Evaluation and conclusions (30%). 700 words There is an effective evaluation plan with clear measures related to the objectives. The evaluation plan is adequately described. Results are related to objective and follow effective data analysis techniques. There is a clear conclusion about the effectiveness of the campaign and lessons learnt.

Criterion 4: Professional Presentation (10%). The assignment is well written, organised and professionally presented, i.e. it is free of spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors; it is 1.5 or doubled-spaced with normal margins; sources are accurately cited using APA referencing; pages are numbered. The signed consent form has been submitted.