Nursing Inter-Professional Collaboration

The two requirements for this assignment, which shall be labeled as subheadings, are:
1) Constructive professional and supportive feedback and assistance with critique of selected project.
NUR456 Inter-Professional Collaboration: Partnership Project Guidelines
1/9/19 2 NUR456: Application of Professional Nursing Concepts
What suggestions can you offer? Are they doing a PowerPoint, teaching plan, audit, or web page? What advice can you offer? What problem- solving tips
can you lend? Have they posted evidence for review? If so, what is your evaluation? If they made project revisions, are they sound? Is the project adhering to
best practice? Look at the project objectives and expected week of completion, does the activity report indicate they are up to date or are they falling
behind? The middle of any project can drag, lose interest, having the project assistant there to review where the project stands and what needs to be
happening, can be a motivator. Make sure faculty can tell you are really following this project and thinking critically.
2) Share relevant and meaningful information, helpful literature, websites,etc.
What resources can you suggest to aid in project completion? What makes the resource especially important? Share your own professional experiences as
they relate to the project. What will help with evidence of completion? Again, faculty is evaluating your ability to think critically, not just for your project, but
a peer project too.
Evaluation Rubric
Category Excellent Fell Short of Excellent Below Expectations
Content Complete, concise, and detailed
response that meets requirements.
(5 points)
Missing minor details or one of the
requirements was not fully addressed.
(4 points)
Missing key details or one or more of the
requirements was not fully addressed.
(2 points)
Quality Provided solid feedback and thorough
critique to help the project manager.
The quality of information was perfect
for the project.
(5 points)
The feedback provided did not reflect the
high level of critical thinking expected.
(4 points)
Feedback provided too basic missed flaws
in concepts; did not provide significant
advice reflective of critical analysis.
(2 points)
Recommendations
& Resources
Outstanding resources and
recommendations provided were
perfect reflecting high level of critical
thinking.
Demonstrated thoughtful consideration
of literature/ resources/experiences.
(5 points)
Response lacks discussion of importance of
resources to project. Recommendations
not reflective of problem solving.
(3 points)
Did not provide discussion of relevance of
resources or no resources were provided.
(0 points)
Grammar &
Organization
Overall response contained
grammatically correct sentences without
any spelling errors. Subheadings were
labeled.
(5 points)
Response had a 1-2 grammatically incorrect
sentences and/or spelling errors.
(4 points)
Response had 3 or more grammatically
incorrect sentences and/or several
spelling errors. Did not label the
subheadings with two requirements as
instructed.
(2 points)
Total: 20 points

Preferred language style US English