Professional Communications

WRITING YOUR ASSIGNMENT:  This assignment must be completed individually.  You must use the Harvard referencing system.  Your work must indicate the number of words you have used. Written assignments must not exceed the specified maximum number of words. When a written assignment is marked, the excessive use of words beyond the word limit is reflected in the academic judgement of the piece of work which results in a lower mark being awarded for the piece of work (regulation 6.74).  Assignment submissions are to be made anonymously. Do not write your name anywhere on your work.  Write your student ID number at the top of every page.  Where the assignment comprises more than one task, all tasks must be submitted in a single document.  You must number all pages. SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENT: In order to achieve full marks, you must submit your work before the deadline. Work that is submitted late – up to five working days after the published submission deadline – will be accepted and marked. However, the element of the module’s assessment to which the work contributes will be capped with a maximum mark of 40%. Work cannot be submitted if the period of 5 working days after the deadline has passed (unless there is an approved extension). Failure to submit within the relevant period will mean that you have failed the assessment. Requests for short-term extensions will only be considered in the case of illness or other cause considered valid by the iCentre Adviser. Please contact iCentre@lca.anglia.ac.uk. A request must normally be received and agreed by the iCentre Adviser in writing at least 24 hours prior to the deadline. See rules 6.56-6.65: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf Mitigation: The deadline for submission of mitigation in relation to this assignment is no later than five working days after the submission date of this work. Please contact iCentre@lca.anglia.ac.uk See rules 6.103 – 6.132: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf Briefing Document This task requires you to write a briefing document. An issue relating to ARUL was going to be discussed at a meeting, but due to unavoidable circumstances, the group is not able to meet and so you must produce an individual briefing document covering the key issues. Your report will evaluate possible changes at ARUL, summarising the issues and giving a recommendation for action. Any suitable written format is acceptable for this assessment and you are not required to stick rigidly to an essay or report format. However, you should still observe academic conventions such as referencing, appropriate academic style, and so on. Firstly, read the scenario and articles that have been uploaded to the VLE in the folder marked “ASSESSMENT ARTICLES.” Examine the scenario and articles, identify the issues and different possibilities for providing resolutions. You must then decide on ONE course of action or a solution to the issue/problem you have identified. Your 1,500 word Briefing Document should:  Introduce the nature of the issue that is being addressed  Outline briefly the possible solutions that could be adopted  Examine in detail why you are not recommending at least two possible solutions  Explain which solution you are recommending, and provide justifications  Conclude your document with a summary of your main points  Provide a list of references Points to consider  Your document should examine and explore a range of possible solutions to the situation in the scenario and all relevant aspects.  You should make as much use of the materials provided as appropriate and explore as many ideas and solutions as possible.  You should recommend one particular solution by examining different possibilities.  You could decide to recommend further information is gathered before a final decision is taken, but you should be clear and specific about what further information is required and to what outcomes this would lead to.  Marks will be awarded for the clarity and effectiveness of your arguments ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Level 3 (Access) prepares students to function effectively at Level 4. Criteria for assessment at Level 3 reflect the preparatory nature of these modules. Students are expected to demonstrate the acquisition of generic learning skills appropriate for self-managed learning in an HE context. Students are expected to demonstrate that they have acquired the underpinning discipline-specific skills, knowledge and understanding necessary to undertake a programme of higher education. Mark Bands Outcome Adapted Assessment Criteria Knowledge & Understanding Intellectual (thinking), Practical, Affective and Transferable Skills Characteristics of Student Achievement by Marking Band 90-100% Achieves module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level – Exceptional use and extension of material provided – Arguments are always both highly appropriate and extremely effective – Justifies and elaborates exceptionally on all points, where appropriate – Demonstrates exceptional academic style and register throughout – Manages all point and counterpoint and with exceptional skill – Exceptional awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with exceptional balance of arguments – Exceptional coherence – Completely appropriate reference to material provided 80-89% – Outstanding use of material provided – Arguments are consistently both highly appropriate and effective – Justifies and elaborates on all points, where appropriate – Demonstrates outstanding academic style and register – Manages all point and counterpoint extremely skilfully – Fully aware of different perspectives and responds accordingly with outstanding balance of arguments – Fully coherent – Appropriate reference to material provided 70-79% – Excellent use of material provided – Arguments are both highly appropriate and effective – Justifies and elaborates on points, where appropriate – Demonstrates excellent academic style and register – Manages point and counterpoint skilfully – Excellent awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with excellent balance of arguments – Excellent coherence – Mostly appropriate reference to material provided 60-69% – Good use of material provided – Arguments are both appropriate and effective – Justifies and elaborates on most points, where appropriate – Demonstrates good academic style and register – Generally manages point and counterpoint naturally and skilfully – Good awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with good balance of arguments – Good coherence – Often appropriate reference to material provided 50-59% – Satisfactory use of material provided – Arguments are generally appropriate and effective – Justifies and elaborates on some points, where appropriate – Demonstrates satisfactory academic style and register – Satisfactory management of point and counterpoint – Satisfactory awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with satisfactory balance of arguments – Satisfactory coherence – Some appropriate reference to material provided 40-49% A marginal pass in module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level – Basic use of material provided – Arguments are sometimes appropriate or effective – Justifies and elaborates on few points, where appropriate – Demonstrates basic academic style and register – Basic management of point and counterpoint – Basic awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with basic balance of arguments – Basic coherence – Little appropriate reference to material provided 30-39% A marginal fail in module outcome(s) related to GLO at this level. Possible compensation. Satisfies qualifying mark – Limited use of material provided – Arguments are limited in appropriacy or effectiveness – Justifies and elaborates on very few points – Demonstrates limited appropriacy in academic style and register – Limited management of point and counterpoint – Limited awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with limited balance of arguments – Limited coherence – Some inappropriate reference to material provided 20-29% Fails to achieve module outcome(s) related to this GLO. Qualifying mark not satisfied. No compensation available – Little use of material provided – Arguments are very weak in appropriacy or effectiveness – Justifies and elaborates on almost no points – Demonstrates little appropriacy in academic style and register – Little management of point and counterpoint – Little awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly little balance of arguments – Little coherence – Basic or mostly inappropriate reference to material provided 10-19% – Inadequate use of material provided – Arguments are very weak in appropriacy or effectiveness – May show no justification or elaboration on any points – Inadequate academic style and register – Inadequate management of point and counterpoint – Inadequate awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with inadequate balance of arguments – Little coherence – Completely inappropriate reference to material provided 1-9% – No use of material provided – No Arguments or are inappropriate or ineffective – No justification or elaboration on any points – No academic style and register – No management of point and counterpoint – No awareness of different perspectives and responds accordingly with no balance of arguments – No coherence – Completely inappropriate or no reference to material provided 0% Awarded for: (i) non-submission; (ii) dangerous practice and; (iii) in situations where the student fails to address the assignment.For more information on Professional Communications read :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_communication

Professional Communications

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Professional Communications
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
                                                                                                                        ACME Writers